Connect with us
The Intel Arc Balanced Builds initiative will help you choose The Intel Arc Balanced Builds initiative will help you choose

Gaming

The Intel Arc Balanced Builds initiative will help you choose the best CPU and GPU for your games. The company admits that in some cases the Core i9 is not worth buying

Published

on

Intel has announced the Arc Balanced Builds initiative to help users build their own PC with the best performance/price ratio.

The Intel Arc Balanced Builds initiative will help you choose the best CPU and GPU for your games.  The company admits that in some cases the Core i9 is not worth buying

The essence of Intel’s idea is very simple: the company tested bundles of different CPUs and GPUs, making 15,000 tests, and clearly showed which pairs of processors and video cards are the most profitable in terms of price-performance ratio.

The Intel Arc Balanced Builds initiative will help you choose the best CPU and GPU for your games.  The company admits that in some cases the Core i9 is not worth buying

Of course, Intel came to conclusions that have been known for many years: for most video cards, there is no point in a very powerful CPU. Despite the fact that it is in the interests of Intel itself to sell the most expensive products to as many users as possible, the company demonstrates that when buying an Arc A380 video card, there is no point in an expensive CPU, and you can limit yourself to the Core i3 line model. In the case of the Arc A750 and A770, the Core i5 will suffice.

In the case of the Arc A750 and the RTX 3060 taken for comparison, the difference between the Core i5-12400F and the Core i9-13900K is 6-7%. It is worth noting that Intel tested in Full HD and 1440p resolutions, as the most common. At 4K, the processor will be even less important for gaming.

The Intel Arc Balanced Builds initiative will help you choose the best CPU and GPU for your games.  The company admits that in some cases the Core i9 is not worth buying

The Intel Arc Balanced Builds initiative will help you choose the best CPU and GPU for your games.  The company admits that in some cases the Core i9 is not worth buying

The initiative is intended to help gamers choose new components, but Intel is also working with partners to bring the right PC or pair of components to market.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Gaming

Most games will run on the Snapdragon X Elite SoC. The performance issue is still open

Published

on

Most games will run on the Snapdragon X Elite SoC

Laptops based on the Qualcomm SoC of the Snapdragon X Elite line should appear on the market this summer. The first tests show that in terms of processor performance, at least in these very tests, the top platform of the line is very good. Now Qualcomm says games will run on the Snapdragon X Elite too.

Most games will run on the Snapdragon X Elite SoC.  The performance issue is still open

More precisely, the company representative said that most games will run on Snapdragon X Elite. Here, of course, we are not talking about GPU performance, about which we still don’t really know anything, but about the technical side. Since we’re talking about the Arm platform, running software built for x86-bit architecture requires certain manipulations. Qualcomm says game developers will have three options to choose from.

First, they can port their games to ARM64 to achieve the best CPU performance and power consumption. Of course, no one will do this for the sake of laptops on Snapdragon X Elite at first.

Second, developers can create a hybrid ARM64EC application where Windows, its libraries, and Qualcomm drivers run natively, but the rest of the application is emulated to achieve near-native performance. This also requires additional actions from developers. But the third option is that developers can do practically nothing, and their games should still work, but using x64 emulation. It is not yet known how much performance will suffer. Let us remember that the problem is that Snapdragon X Elite does not support discrete video cards, that is, in any case, it relies only on its own GPU.

Continue Reading

Components

Introduced inexpensive 4K ViewSonic monitor for MacBook and consoles

Published

on

Introduced inexpensive 4K ViewSonic monitor for MacBook and consoles

ViewSonic has released a new 27-inch monitor called the VG2781-4K, designed specifically for Apple Mac users. The monitor is now available on JD.com for $239.

Introduced inexpensive 4K ViewSonic monitor for MacBook and consoles

The monitor has a minimalistic design, it is equipped with a narrow frame and a 27-inch 4K Ultra HD IPS screen with a frequency of 60 Hz and a brightness of 400 cd / m2. In terms of color accuracy, it boasts 10-bit color covering 100% of the sRGB color gamut, 95% of the DCI-P3 color gamut, and 92% of the Adobe RGB color gamut. The VG2781-4K is also recommended for use with PS5, Xbox Series and Nintendo Switch consoles.

It has 178-degree viewing angles and is equipped with two 3W speakers. The monitor stand supports tilt, height adjustment, left-right swivel and vertical rotation.

Introduced inexpensive 4K ViewSonic monitor for MacBook and consoles

The monitor features a USB-C port (supports 96W PD charging), 2 HDMI 2.0 ports, 1 DP 1.2 port, 1 USB-B 3.0 port, and 3 USB-A 3.0 ports. It can stream 4K images, data, and charge your MacBook or mobile devices using a USB-C cable.

Continue Reading

Components

What happens if you run a game with ray tracing only on the processor without using a video card? Tests showed that there will be 1 fps

Published

on

What happens if you run a game with ray tracing

Modern video cards already do a good job with ray tracing, although a lot depends on its implementation. Now it is possible to run tracing on the CPU.

What happens if you run a game with ray tracing only on the processor without using a video card?  Tests showed that there will be 1 fps

The developer of the Mesa library has implemented support for ray tracing on the processor in Vulkan and tested it in Quake II RTX. Even at 720p resolution, performance was only 1 fps. True, for some reason the authors did not indicate the processor model, which makes the tests not particularly clear, but, on the other hand, it is unlikely that professionals would use any old CPU for such a task.

Be that as it may, if the most powerful modern CPUs with a huge number of cores can already cope with games that are undemanding by modern standards without a GPU at all, they are unlikely to be able to do ray tracing yet.

Continue Reading

Most Popular