

Components
Nvidia RTX 30 graphics cards continue to drop in price slightly. The most profitable in terms of the size of the margin is the GeForce RTX 3090
A couple of weeks ago, the rapid drop in prices for video cards in the European market slowed down, and some models even went up in price. Today, prices are back in motion.
Recall that we are considering the lowest prices for Europe, comparing them with early values.
RX 6700 XT | RX 6800 | RX 6800 XT | RX 6900 XT | RTX 3060 | RTX 3060 Ti | RTX 3070 | RTX 3080 | RTX 3090 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minimum price at 26.06, euros | 730 | 960 | 1100 | 1430 | 600 | 720 | 890 | 1290 | 1970 |
Minimum price at 12.07, euros | 700 | 1000 | 1188 | 1530 | 600 | 730 | 852 | 1250 | 1990 |
The minimum price at the moment, euros | 700 | 1050 | 1167 | 1480 | 580 | 690 | 820 | 1300 | 1925 |
As you can see, some video cards have risen in price, but some have started to fall in price again. Moreover, when compared with prices from June 26, then almost all AMD video cards have risen in price. Nvidia’s adapters, on the other hand, have for the most part dropped in price relative to any previous value, reaching their lowest prices in about six months, if not more.
At the moment, the closest thing to the recommended price is the GeForce RTX 3090, which has a 24% mark-up.
The availability of graphics cards has also improved, although, of course, prices and assortments can vary greatly from market to market.

Components
Operating at only 66%, 96-core AMD processors wipe out all competitors. Epyc Genoa test results in Cinebench R23

The test results of two AMD Epyc server processors of the Genoa generation with 96 cores each have appeared on the Web. According to available data, this is either Epyc 9664 or Epyc 9654.
The CPU was tested in Cinebench R23, and the catch is that this software recognizes a maximum of 256 threads. Two 96-core processors have 384 threads thanks to SMT support. That is, the result obtained in the benchmark reflects only two thirds of the capabilities of the tested pair of CPUs.
Despite this, the processors scored over 110,000 points in multi-threaded mode. In a single thread, the result was 1302 points.
For comparison, one 64-core Threadripper 5995WX gains about the same amount (even a little more), but overclocked to 5.15 GHz using liquid nitrogen. The comparison with the direct competitor Xeon Platinum 8480+ is more interesting. A system with two of these 56-core processors scores only about 68,500 points. True, the source says that there were problems in the operation of these CPUs, so serial processors may show slightly better results. However, in any case, the gap is huge, because even two current-generation 64-core Epyc 7763 score 98,000 points. As a result, it is not yet clear whether the new Intel server processors will be able to somehow withstand the monsters of AMD. In addition, judging by the latest data, Sapphire Rapids-SP will eventually be delayed even more and will not be released until next year.
Components
Almost all new Intel Core processors will have 14 or more cores. Specs for most Raptor Lake CPUs revealed

The specs for almost every Intel desktop processor of the Raptor Lake generation have surfaced online.
According to this document, we are waiting for 14 CPUs with the number of cores from four to 24, while there will be only one quad-core – Core i3-13100. The next model (Core i5-13400) will have 10 cores, and it will also be the only one, because the Core i5-13500 and a number of older CPUs will already offer 14 cores.
Only the Core i9s will get the new die type, as only they will have a full configuration with eight large and 16 small cores. By the way, the Core i9-13900KS is not in the table, so it really may not be, especially if we recall the recent data on the 350-watt power limit for older Cores.
Components
Overclocked to 6.2 GHz, the Intel Core i9-13900K processor was 60% faster than the current flagship AMD Ryzen 5950X
The 13th generation Intel Core processors (Raptor Lake) continue to amaze with their overclocking capabilities and, as a result, performance. Another experiment was set up on an engineering sample of the Core i9-13900KF, whose high-performance cores were overclocked to a frequency of 6.2 GHz. The frequency of 5.2 GHz was also the most energy efficient.
In Cinebench R23, this CPU scored 42,790 in the multi-threaded test and 2263 in the single-threaded test – a very good result, especially considering that the tested CPU with lower frequencies – 5.8 GHz (high-performance cores) and 4.7 GHz (energy efficient) . With such overclocking, the Core i9-13900KF turned out to be noticeably faster than both the Core i9-12900K and even more so the Ryzen 9 5950X in a single-threaded test, and in a multi-threaded performance difference is about 50% in favor of the new Intel CPU.
In addition to Cinebench, the overclocked Core i9-13900KF was also tested in CPU-Z. In this test, it outperformed the Ryzen 9 5950X by about 60% in both single and multi-threaded tests. The superiority over the Core i9-12900K in the multi-threaded test is 70%, in the single-threaded test it is already 20%.
-
Phones5 days ago
iOS 16 and iPhone 14 will bring with them a huge amount of advertising
-
News5 days ago
Nikon Z8 will receive a very attractive price
-
Electric Cars7 days ago
Revealed jet-powered Zapata JetRacer flying car that flies on kerosene
-
Phones5 days ago
The world’s thinnest smartphone Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 goes on sale in China tomorrow
online store
August 5, 2021 at 08:20
It’s going to be end of mine day, but before end I am reading this fantastic
paragraph to improve my knowledge.
notebook reparatur
August 13, 2021 at 07:53
I have learn some good stuff here. Definitely price
bookmarking for revisiting. I wonder how much
attempt you place to make this sort of excellent informative site.
Norberto
August 14, 2021 at 15:45
Hey there, You’ve done an excellent job. I will definitely digg
it and personally recommend to my friends. I am sure they will be benefited from this site.
UFABET
August 20, 2021 at 15:40
Wow that was strange. I just wrote an incredibly long comment but after I clicked submit my
comment didn’t appear. Grrrr… well I’m not writing all that over
again. Regardless, just wanted to say superb blog!