AMD introduced the Radeon RX 6600 graphics card, which for some time will be the most affordable in the current line. The MSRP is $ 330.
The RX 6600 XT costs $ 50 or 15% more, and the difference in performance between the two, according to AMD itself, is also about 15%. Also, the RX 6600 is positioned as a direct competitor to the GeForce RTX 3060 at exactly the same price. It is difficult to say what prices will be on the market at the moment, but now in Europe the RTX 3060 and RX 6600 XT start at 600 euros, so the new product may be more affordable.
So the RX 6600 is based on a Navi 23 GPU with 1,792 stream processors active. The core operates at frequencies of 2044-2491 MHz, and 8 GB of GDDR6 memory at 14 GHz. The memory bus is 128-bit, and the Infinity Cache cache is 32 MB. The TBP of the card is only 132 W, and in terms of energy efficiency, the new AMD product significantly outperforms the competitor.
What’s missing in the new MacBook Pros yet? Support for external video cards did not appear here either.
As you know, the first Apple laptops on the SoC M1 do not support external video cards. We now know this is true for the new M1 Pro and M1 Max-based MacBook Pros as well.
Despite the presence of Thinderbolt 4 ports, Apple’s new laptops lack support for external graphics cards, and the company has yet to explain this limitation. Perhaps it is primarily due to the Apple Silicon architecture.
Of course, we have already seen that, at least for the M1 Max, using an external video card may be pointless, but we will not mention the M1 Pro and the original M1.
Whether support for external video cards will appear in future Apple laptops with its own platforms is anyone’s guess. It is possible that GPU performance in Apple Silicon will grow at such a rate that discrete adapters will really not be useful in the corresponding bundles.
Recall also that the new MacBook Pro also lacks support for the latest standards for SD memory cards.
Finally, Windows 11 users have the full power of Ryzen processors. Both performance issues have been resolved
AMD and Microsoft have finally resolved both Ryzen and Epyc CPU performance issues when running Windows 11.
Microsoft has already released the patch in the Insider Build, now it’s available to everyone. Recall that it solves the problem of high latency in the L3 cache.
AMD, in turn, has released a patch that solves the problem of UEFI CPPC2 with incorrect work of the task scheduler for processor cores.
In the case of the first patch, you need to install a Windows update, but the second one needs to be downloaded from the AMD website yourself. More precisely, you do not need to download a patch, but a fresh driver for the motherboard chipset – the patch is part of it.
Top mobile graphics cards can’t handle the Apple M1 Max SoC? The GPU tests of the new MacBook Pro platform appeared
The graphics core of the Apple M1 Max SoC is characterized by a performance of 10.4 TFLOPS, which puts it on a par with the GPU in the PlayStation 5 or, for example, with the GeForce RTX 2080. True, the performance in TFLOPS depends solely on the number of ALUs in the GPU and the frequency, so that this indicator has little to do with real performance. But now we can finally appreciate the real power of the M1 Max.
Not in games yet, but in a benchmark, but this is already something. In this case, we are talking about the GFXBench test software, and the competitors for the new Apple platform were the Apple M1 SoC, the Radeon RX 6800M and the mobile GeForce RTX 3080. The last two cards roughly match the performance of the desktop Radeon RX 6700 XT and GeForce RTX 3070, respectively.
As you can see, the GPU in the M1 Max is often faster than both very powerful discrete graphics cards, which is impressive. More precisely, out of nine tests, M1 Max was the clear leader in four and outperformed AMD and Nvidia cards by a narrow margin in another. In addition, of the remaining four tests, the Apple solution lost insignificantly, and in two more it was at the level of the Radeon card. In fact, only one test showed a very large gap between the M1 Max and discrete graphics cards.
As for the comparison with the M1, where the GPU cores are four times less, here the gain is always very large, although sometimes it is still less than twofold.
Of course, you need to wait for tests in games to put an end to this confrontation, but here it is worth understanding two aspects. First, the powerful GPU in the MacBook Pro isn’t needed for gaming. Secondly, we are still talking about a single-chip system with a very low power consumption by the standards of a CPU or GPU, which at the same time is able to compete and surpass full-fledged CPUs and GPUs.
Vulnerability in WinRAR allows code to run without the user’s knowledge
To carry out an attack, you need to create a malicious Wi-Fi access point, hack a router, and spoof DNS....
Vodafone is suing the UK over a contract to develop a hacker-proof communication line
The company considers it unfair that the contract was awarded to Fujitsu, although both bidders did not meet the requirements....
Smartwatches are under $ 100. LeTV Watch W6 presented
LeEco has already presented the LeTV S1 smartphone as part of its return to the market, and now it has...
Three former Apple engineers helped disassemble the Apple Watch Series 7. The watch has more in common with the iPhone 13 than you might think
Specialists of the popular iFixit resource, specializing in the repair of various electronics, disassembled the new Apple Watch Series 7...
Security6 days ago
FreakOut Botnet Turns DVRs Into Monero Cryptominers
Components5 days ago
Intel Alder Lake (Core 12) processors have potential problems with many games
Phones6 days ago
For the first time in the arena: Samsung Galaxy S22 and Galaxy S22 + screen protectors show very thin bezels
News6 days ago
Bitcoin mining will provide heat to the whole city. MintGreen to start heating North Vancouver next winter