Connect with us
1615048738 Mobile GeForce RTX 3070 vs Desktop How far is the 1615048738 Mobile GeForce RTX 3070 vs Desktop How far is the

Components

Mobile GeForce RTX 3070 vs. Desktop. How far is the graphics card in a laptop from the same in a desktop PC?

Published

on

As you know, the generation of Nvidia Ampere graphics cards for laptops is very different from desktop cards, which was not the case in the past two generations.

The reason is simple – Ampere cards are significantly more powerful than Turing adapters, but they also consume a lot, so in order to fit new solutions into mobile PCs, Nvidia had to significantly cut the parameters of the cards.

As a result, desktop and mobile cards with the same name can be very different in performance. But how strong – this is what the specialists of the TechSpot resource decided to check. They compared the desktop and mobile GeForce RTX 3070, and in the case of the mobile version, they evaluated adapters with different TDPs. They also added a number of other video cards to this, and it turned out to be a very voluminous and informative comparison.

As always, you can look at the source for detailed tests in different games, but we will select the most important diagrams.

1615048721 824 Mobile GeForce RTX 3070 vs Desktop How far is the 1615048721 667 Mobile GeForce RTX 3070 vs Desktop How far is the

To begin with, you should pay attention to the difference between the mobile versions of the adapter with different power limits. As you can see, it reaches 15-20% on average, sometimes reaching 30%. This once again shows that the choice of a gaming laptop should be approached carefully. Fortunately, Nvidia still obliged laptop manufacturers to provide details about the Ampere adapters.

1615048721 689 Mobile GeForce RTX 3070 vs Desktop How far is the 1615048722 374 Mobile GeForce RTX 3070 vs Desktop How far is the 1615048722 358 Mobile GeForce RTX 3070 vs Desktop How far is the 1615048723 565 Mobile GeForce RTX 3070 vs Desktop How far is the

If we are talking about the difference between desktop and mobile cards, then even in the case of the 115-watt mobile RTX 3070, the desktop card turns out to be 30-35% faster on average, and in some games the difference can exceed 50-60% (in Full HD). If we compare it with an 80-watt mobile card, then the desktop one turns out to be one and a half times faster, and in some games the advantage can reach 70-80%.

As a result, of course, it is impossible to talk about at least an approximate identity of the mobile and desktop RTX 3070 in terms of performance. These are cards of completely different classes, providing completely different performance.

At the same time, in absolute terms, the mobile RTX 3070 still looks very decent, ahead of the desktop RTX 2070 Super by 10-20% (if we are talking about the 115-watt version of the first).

It’s also worth noting that the 80-watt RTX 3070 is roughly equal to the 115-watt RTX 3060, but we’ve mentioned this more than once before.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Components

Some motherboards will turn the Core i9-13900K into a power consumption monster. The power limit will increase to 350W

Published

on

Some motherboards will turn the Core i9 13900K into a power

Intel can make the Core i9-13900K even more attractive with a new auto-overclocking mode.

Some motherboards will turn the Core i9-13900K into a power consumption monster.  The power limit will increase to 350W

The source reports that some motherboards based on 700-series chipsets will allow you to activate an increased power limit. In this case, we are talking about a value of 350 watts. For comparison, Alder Lake has a maximum of 241 watts.

The values ​​of PL1 and PL2 for the new CPUs will hardly change and will amount to 125 and 253 W, respectively. But there will also be an opportunity to remove the limit, thanks to which the Core i9-13900K will be able to consume up to 350 watts. In this case, of course, the motherboard will need a powerful power supply subsystem, and the processor will need a productive CO.

CPU performance in this mode can increase by 15%, although this will depend on the tasks. Whether the Core i9-13900KS, which was previously assigned a frequency of up to 6 GHz, will be released under such conditions is now unclear.

Continue Reading

Components

This is Ryzen 7 7700X. Pre-sale copy first lit up in the photo

Published

on

This is Ryzen 7 7700X Pre sale copy first lit up

The first photo of the Ryzen 7 7700X processor has appeared on the Web, which should be presented on August 29, and it is expected to go on sale on September 27.

This is Ryzen 7 7700X.  Pre-sale copy first lit up in the photo

Apparently, the picture shows a pre-sale version. Perhaps this is one of the copies for media reviews.

The Ryzen 7 7700X is an octa-core SMT capable CPU up to 5.4GHz with a TDP of 105W. According to leaks, such a processor will cost about $ 300, that is, it will not rise in price relative to its predecessor at the start of sales.

Recall, in addition to this model, a 16-core Ryzen 9 7950X, a 12-core Ryzen 9 7900X and a six-core Ryzen 5 7600X are also expected. Later the line may well expand.

Continue Reading

Components

It became known, because of which the Ryzen 7000 will be delayed a little

Published

on

It became known because of which the Ryzen 7000 will

AMD yesterday confirmed that its next PC product launch event will take place on August 29th. It is believed that Ryzen 7000 processors will be presented on this day. And now it has become known why they will be delayed in entering the market.

It became known, because of which the Ryzen 7000 will be delayed a little

One Chiphell reviewer claims that AMD was originally going to release new items on sale on September 15th, but postponed the launch to September 27th. And the reason is not at all that new Intel CPUs will be presented on the same day. It turned out that AMD is still working on the BIOS for the new Ryzen, which may be the reason for the delay.

Given a number of BIOS issues during the launch of the Ryzen 5000, AMD apparently does not want to repeat this history.

Continue Reading

Most Popular