Connect with us
Apple Watch Series 7 gets the exact same processor as Apple Watch Series 7 gets the exact same processor as

Components

Apple Watch Series 7 gets the exact same processor as last year’s Apple Watch Series 6

Published

on

The company yesterday announced the Apple Watch Series 7 smartwatch, which, contrary to rumors, hasn’t received a completely new design. Moreover, the Apple Watch Series 7 received the exact same processor as last year’s Apple Watch Series 6.

During the presentation, Apple did not say a word about the performance of the Apple Watch Series 7. Usually, the company claims that its new devices are faster or more energy efficient, but this topic was not discussed on stage. On the official Apple website, there is no mention at all of the platform on which the Apple Watch Series 7 is built.

Developer Steve Troughton-Smith confirmed based on the latest version of Xcode (a platform that allows developers to create apps for Apple devices) that Apple Watch Series 7 has the same processor as last year’s Apple Watch Series 6.

Both Apple Watch Series 7 and Apple Watch Series 6 are equipped with the “t8301” processor, which is the codename for the processor in the Apple S6 SiP. Apple Watch does not have the usual printed circuit board; instead, it uses the so-called “system-in-a-box” (SiP).

While the iPhone 13 and iPad mini 6 will go on sale next week, Apple said the Apple Watch Series 7 will be available later this year with no further details.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Components

Ryzen 7000 can be made much colder, but it’s risky. Processor needs to be scalped

Published

on

Ryzen 7000 can be made much colder but its risky

The Ryzen 7000 processors proved to be very productive, but also very hot. Even with liquid cooling systems, temperatures cannot be called low. But there is a way out, even if it is not suitable for everyone.

Ryzen 7000 can be made much colder, but it's risky.  Processor needs to be scalped

The well-known overclocker Der8auer decided to check how much the situation would improve if the cover was removed from the Ryzen 9 7900X. It turned out that this is a very effective way.

When using liquid CO and overclocking to 5.5 GHz on all cores, the temperature was only 70 degrees versus 90 degrees for a conventional CPU with less overclocking. Unfortunately, there are no results without overclocking, but the temperatures will obviously be even lower, that is, already quite within the usual values ​​for most modern processors.

Der8auer used a prototype tool to remove the cover, but a production model should be available later. Of course, this solution is not suitable for everyone, because, firstly, it is risky, and secondly, it deprives the owner of the processor warranty. However, this is still an effective option and it must be borne in mind.

Continue Reading

Components

If the 16-core Ryzen 9 7950X turned out to be incredibly powerful, then how will the 64-core Threadripper be? First Ryzen Threadripper 7000 spotted online

Published

on

If the 16 core Ryzen 9 7950X turned out to be

Ryzen Threadripper 7000 processors have been spotted online for the first time. An unknown 64-core model has found its way into the [email protected] database, and so far we only know about the number of cores and architecture of Zen 4.

If the 16-core Ryzen 9 7950X turned out to be incredibly powerful, then how will the 64-core Threadripper be?  First Ryzen Threadripper 7000 spotted online

The software itself indicates 128 in the “number of processors” column, but in fact it is about the number of threads.

If the 16-core Ryzen 9 7950X turned out to be incredibly powerful, then how will the 64-core Threadripper be?  First Ryzen Threadripper 7000 spotted online

Ryzen Threadripper has always been as close as possible to Epyc server CPUs and previously always matched them in terms of the maximum number of cores. However, we know that 96-core Epyc Genoa CPUs are waiting for us this year, but it’s not a fact that the older Ryzen Threadripper 7000 will also receive 96 cores.

That being said, even 64-core Zen 4 should offer phenomenal performance for the class, given what the 16-core Ryzen 9 7950X is capable of.

Continue Reading

Components

Intel decided to release Core processors without large cores at all. Core i3-N300 and Core i3-N305 lit up on the Web

Published

on

Intel decided to release Core processors without large cores at

Despite the fact that Intel has already introduced older Raptor Lake desktop CPUs, it is only getting ready to release new Alder Lake processors. We are talking about ultra-power efficient Alder Lake-N CPUs, and today we have a first look at a couple of such models.

Intel decided to release Core processors without large cores at all.  Core i3-N300 and Core i3-N305 lit up on the Web

They are called Core i3-N300 and Core i3-N305. There is a version that these are the older Alder Lake-N, and the rest will be presented under the new Processor brand, which will replace the Pentium and Celeron.

Intel decided to release Core processors without large cores at all.  Core i3-N300 and Core i3-N305 lit up on the Web

The most important feature of the new products is that they have eight cores, but these are all small cores. They, recall, do not support Hyper-Threading. Core i3-N305 frequencies are 1.8-3.8 GHz. And such a CPU in Geekbench is gaining 1025 and 4420 points in single-threaded and multi-threaded modes, respectively. For comparison, the high-performance Core i7-8750H gains about the same, and now we are talking only about small cores. Of course, Geekbench doesn’t show real-world performance in apps, but the results so far are encouraging.

Thus, apparently, the new CPUs will be sufficiently productive for their segment, despite the fact that these will be the weakest processors of the Core family within their generation.

Continue Reading

Most Popular