Connect with us
An enthusiast was able to run iOS on a computer An enthusiast was able to run iOS on a computer

Computers

An enthusiast was able to run iOS on a computer. True, only the very first version

Published

on

Enthusiasts have been trying to run iOS on computers for many years, but only now they have succeeded. The developer Martin de Vos, known under the nickname devos50, was able to implement this.

An enthusiast was able to run iOS on a computer.  True, only the very first version

It is noted that he used reverse engineering to do this. As a basis, he used the QEMU emulator, which allowed him to run iPhone OS 1.0, which was released in 2007. Initially, this operating system was intended for the first generation iPod touch, later it appeared on the first iPhone.

devos50 spent over a year building the emulator because there were a lot of things to figure out. However, in the end, the system works and even supports multitouch. De Vos himself explained that emulating the hardware components was the most difficult part.

An enthusiast was able to run iOS on a computer.  True, only the very first version

The author also explained why he chose the first version of the system. It simply has fewer security mechanisms that are difficult to emulate. Devos50 also said that his work relies on OpeniBoot. This is Apple’s open source implementation of the bootloader. Although the project was curtailed a long time ago, at one time it was possible to install Android on the first generations of the iPod touch and iPhone with its help.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Computers

How much faster is Mac than iPhone? All current Apple A Bionic platforms and all Apple M SoCs were brought together in one big test

Published

on

How much faster is Mac than iPhone All current Apple

The MacWorld resource decided to compare all the current Apple M and Apple A platforms in one big test.

How much faster is Mac than iPhone?  All current Apple A Bionic platforms and all Apple M SoCs were brought together in one big test

Unfortunately, there are only results in Geekbench, albeit including the GPU. These results do not always correspond to the alignment of forces in real tasks, but at least we have a comparison of two dozen SoCs.

How much faster is Mac than iPhone?  All current Apple A Bionic platforms and all Apple M SoCs were brought together in one big test

How much faster is Mac than iPhone?  All current Apple A Bionic platforms and all Apple M SoCs were brought together in one big test

As you can see, the difference in single-threaded performance is very small, even when comparing the 2020 A14 Bionic to the latest M2 Pro/Max. Multi-threaded mode puts everything in its place. The undisputed leader remains the M1 Ultra, as it contains a 20-core CPU. The base M2 Pro with a 10-core CPU performs almost on par with the M1 Max, and all other platforms are already far behind. It is immediately clear at the same time that there is actually quite a big difference between the SoC for the iPhone and for the Mac, although the A16 Bionic is still not catastrophically behind the base M1.

How much faster is Mac than iPhone?  All current Apple A Bionic platforms and all Apple M SoCs were brought together in one big test

As for the GPU, the difference between the platforms is even greater, which is logical, given the difference in the number of GPU cores. Here, too, the M1 Ultra in the top version has no competitors, although the M2 Max with a 38-core GPU outperforms the base M1 Ultra with a 48-core GPU. It should also be noted that the M1 Max in any configuration is faster than the M2 Pro. The result of the M2 in the iPad Pro also looks interesting, where the GPU is not much slower than in the base M2 Pro.

Continue Reading

Components

The new Apple Mac Pro will not support discrete graphics cards. Adding RAM won’t work either.

Published

on

The new Apple Mac Pro will not support discrete graphics

The new Mac Pro model due this year will not support discrete graphics cards.

Well-known Bloomberg journalist and insider Mark Gurman claims that with the transition to Apple Silicon, the most expensive and powerful PC of the Cupertino giant will lose support for discrete 3D cards and will only use GPUs in single-chip systems.

The new Apple Mac Pro will not support discrete graphics cards.  Adding RAM won't work either.

The GPU itself, apparently in the top configuration, will have 76 cores. This is a lot, since even the M2 Max with a 38-core GPU is able to compete with mid-range GeForce RTX video cards at least in benchmarks. However, it is worth remembering that the current Mac Pro, if desired, can be equipped with two dual-chip Radeon Pro W6800X Duo with a total performance of over 30 TFLOPS. True, only for these adapters you will have to pay almost $ 10,000.

In any case, it will be very interesting to see if the top-end Mac Pro can compete with its predecessor in GPU-intensive tasks.

Gurman also says that the new Mac Pro will not get replaceable RAM. Actually, both statements are quite logical, since all PCs with Apple Silicon do not have external RAM and do not support discrete graphics cards. Now the Mac Pro allows you to install up to 768 GB of RAM, and the new model may well lose on this indicator.

Continue Reading

Computers

Apple simply does not have weak PCs left. $600 Mac mini beats $6,000 Mac Pro

Published

on

Apple simply does not have weak PCs left 600 Mac

With the transition to its own Apple M platforms, Apple has made it so that there are simply no weak PCs in its assortment now. According to recent tests, the $600 Mac mini outperforms the base Mac Pro, which costs an order of magnitude more!

Apple simply does not have weak PCs left.  $600 Mac mini beats $6,000 Mac Pro

So far, there are tests only in Geekbench, where the novelty scores 1944 and 8790 points in single-threaded and multi-threaded modes, respectively, while the $6000 Mac Pro on the eight-core Intel Xeon scores 1019 and 8037 points. That is, the single-threaded performance of the Mac Pro is almost half that!

At the same time, of course, it is still unclear whether the Mac mini is faster in real tasks, but here we need to wait for the tests. Also, do not forget that Mac Pro not only allows you to update the configuration, but also install various 3D cards, expansion cards, etc., in Mac mini, nothing can be replaced at all.

Continue Reading

Most Popular